SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (776147)3/22/2014 2:50:59 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) of 1573908
 
<<
Hi koan; Re: "There is a probability for anything (the HUP!).";

Not true.

In QM, conservation principles exclude a lot of things. For example, while it's possible for the vacuum to create things of a given energy, that is only possible if their lifetime is sufficiently small. For measurements taken over long time, these can be excluded.

And for things you'd like to imagine, for example, having a "10" supermodel, who's sexually attracted to you, appear in your bedroom for an hour, you can compute the probabilities for these happening. They're so low as to be excluded by the theory itself. That is, the total evidence that we have in favor of QM could be wrong. That's a very small probability but it's huge compared to the supermodel probability. Another way of saying the same thing is that QM could be wrong, but at a very small level. If that level is around the supermodel probability, you wouldn't be able to detect the difference. And so you really can't say that "anything" is possible according to QM.>>

Did you smoke a joint before you posted that?

QM is all about probability and even low probability is probability.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext