SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elllk who wrote (11115)12/12/1997 9:44:00 AM
From: Tommaso   of 18056
 
"Easy to blame Greenspan but Hoover who got the blame for 1929 spent a lot of 1928 and 1929 trying to talk the market down to no avail. There is only so much these guys
can do."

Well, I would not want to trade places with Greenspan and I think in most respects he has done a fine job--though Volcker was even better and set things up for him. But the Fed does have the power (which it did not have when Hoover was in--and which Presidents don't have anyway) to raise the margin rate from the current 50%. I think he should have tried to get the Fed to do that. As far as I know there's been no effort in that direction. Maybe it wouldn't have prevented speculation, but it couldn't have hurt to try. That what the power is for. For a long time it was set at 100% and sources of funds going into stocks were scrutinized carefully. No bank was supposed to lend you money if they knew you planned to put it into stocks.

Or--not to Monday morning quarterback him--I think Greenspan should push for an immediate raise to 75% margin, now. If he doesn't, the money that's being created to ease the pinch on banks around the world may just inflate the stock market further, leading to a bigger crash.

Or so I think. Just guesses.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext