SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (778687)4/6/2014 3:42:26 PM
From: J_F_Shepard1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (2) of 1574098
 
The law in question is Medicare, not Obamacare....... That case sounds so phony, it;s laughable.... The only person interviewed was the daughter. The doctors refused to be interviewed. They could have admitted the guy and if someone would not and used the 2 midnight rule, he was wrong and should be fired at a minimum....he could have admitted the guy on his authority and settled the dust later. But if he clearly knew the guy went critical and needed more than dialysis, nowhere in that story does it say the father ever received it and he was in the hospital more than a week maybe two... Very early on the daughter was talking about hospice which you should know is called when a patient cannot be helped anymore(except for pain killers) and is dying....hospice cases rarely go over two weeks before the patient dies....

So spike your desire to blame everything on Obamacare, this case had nothing to with it. When you learn of a case of a death caused by the ACA, let me know.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News