That's a wonderful 1950's era Ozzie and Harriet view of things... that presumes we should trust that all the products of the courts are unerringly legitimate, and not all and only a product of politics and self aggrandizing government ? The same issue with politicization that we see in the IRS... are seen in spades on the Supreme Court, with four out of five Justices advocating we eviscerate the First Amendment. Where do you think those Judges came from ? You see the issues in the NSA riding rough shod over the Constitution... but, we shouldn't worry about it... because a SECRET court... says whatever they want is OK ? Yeah, what could possibly go wrong in a Federal court run by one judge... who is part of a system that is as deeply corrupt as the system we have has become ?
The only way you can fail to understand the depth of the problem... is to be ignorant of the nature of the problem... and to believe, right along with John Boehner... that "we can and should trust them" ?
thematrixhasyou.org
The courts are corrupt. You cannot trust that they are not. They view their role, today... as the enforcers of the government... presuming the government is right, and anyone the government challenges is wrong until proven otherwise... while procedure is managed to ensure that won't be allowed to happen.
Reality is that there is no longer any such thing as a reasonable expectation of fairness in the courts. The bias you see in the media... is exactly what you get on the bench... with an intrinsic, implicit presumption that the Feds are always right... with judicial control over procedure being applied to ensure that no one is allowed to show that they are not... and the lawyers also not willing to stand up to the courts usurpations.
Eric Holder... was a judge ?
I'm not willing to assume that Bundy is wrong... because some Judge got his marching orders to say that.
I do find it remarkable... that people can recognize that the nation is in a fight for its survival... with those seeking to subvert what's left of the Founder's vision... and, in the "big picture" fully comprehend that "the rule of law" has been made a fiction... and yet, confronted with a choice at that boundary in awareness... will still choose to believe that the court system is a bastion of impenetrable truth and justice... when reality is that the courts are just another government agency operated for the benefit of the government.
Specifically... take it on yourself... and investigate for yourself the way the courts have dealt with ANY issue that is of core concern to the "powers that be" ?
I'd suggest... an easy choice... to look at the way courts have dealt with the implosion of the mortgage market... because of BANK FRAUD... but, not in court... where the banks are presumed innocent until... well, really, there is no until... and anyone else is presumed to be, and is treated as... the banks property.
The courts are deeply CORRUPT...
Bundy's claims to his origins in interest in the land... do not appear to be in dispute. That means... everything ELSE being claimed... is dependent on PROCESS ? So, do not assume he's wrong... rather than wronged ?
That a judge ruled him wrong... doesn't mean the judge was right... it probably means only that the judge excluded any consideration that would likely weigh in favor of Bundy, and narrowed his consideration of any presentment made to the procedural limits required to ensure he could justify finding as he did... That's how they do it...
|
