Btw, did reseach that controversey of the history of Jewish historian Titus Flavius Josephus, his so called mention of "Jesus" in the controversial "Testimonium Flavianum"? With 100% surety that controversial " historical passage" attributed to him without any doubt is absolutely a forgery.
There is not a chance in this world, solar system or galaxy this was written by Josephus who was ineluctably a Jew, would never have written this. There are many debates & rightly so whether the passage was just doctored in rather than being a complete fake, it is with out any doubt a complete fake.
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
* After only 89 words of the above reserved for this miraculous fellow Jew, “wise man” and great “doer of startling deeds” Jesus Christ, who had an entire “tribe” named after him. Meanwhile in just the very next section Josephus writes at length about “ a woman named Paulina,” a great beauty whose seedy ravishing in the temple of Isis at Rome warranted almost 700 words. Do any bells start to ring here?
This screams forgery, Josephus a meticulous,prolific, professionally faithful Jewish historian writer, was intimately involved & immersed with everything to do with Jersusalem. Was there at the sacking by the Romans, that passage above is nothing but glaring fakery.
(Welcome to folklore 101) |
