SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FJB who wrote (782455)4/28/2014 6:52:53 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1578133
 
>> Would you disagree that marijuana should be treated the same way as alcohol at the very least?

Sure. I wouldn't advocate kids being free to use marijuana any more than I would alcohol. But I do not think there should be legal consequences for simple possession of most of the now illegal drugs. There needs to be a reliable test for DUI with marijuana, which does not now exist. And DUI laws need to be enforced against marijuana users. Because impaired individuals shouldn't drive.

There was a movement in CA to regulate marijuana "like wine" and I think that is a reasonable thing to do.

But I would also dramatically change the law surrounding possession of opiates such that personal use quantities are never criminalized (as in felony) but possession without a proper Rx would result in mandatory treatment, to be funded by a little of the money saved by not chasing down drug offenders.

It has been shown, time and again, that drug abuse cannot be stopped from the supply side. It has never happened and never will.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext