SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (36282)4/29/2014 7:17:31 PM
From: Lane31 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

   of 42652
 
A survey I just saw says the majority of docs , about 65% I think, plan to take the same number or add new medicaid and medicare patients....

I don't think you read that carefully. So, 35% (100 - 65) will reduce the number of Medicaid and Medicare patients they treat. The rest will either support the same number they already have or add a few more. How does that support your argument?

As for squeezing in more patients, doctors and patients are both already complaining that visits have gotten too short due to the pressures of low reimbursement and quality has dropped. I doubt either the doctors or their extant patients want to reduce quality further. As for cost, there are lots of costs per patient, not per hour. Squeezing in five more patients means someone has to fill out five more sets of paperwork. Staff do that. Doctors have to add consultations with other doctors to their fixed costs as well as any research required for each new patient's problems. Those are all outside the cost of operating an office for a given set of minutes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext