SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (50600)5/2/2014 1:49:32 PM
From: Hawkmoon1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
Sure... Oregon Petition. LMAO.

Laugh all you want, bu the list is made up of some very prestigious individuals.

As of just last year, there apparently wasn't 97% consensus on climate sensitivity..
Apparently there was such a large amount of disagreement that the IPCC removed the link that Anthony Watt's pointed to..

wattsupwiththat.com

And your so called "consensus", was torn apart here..

americanthinker.com

So you're actually claiming something that doesn't even exist.. and even if it did, consensus is NOT science. Scientists have had a consensus on all kinds of things that were later proven to be utterly wrong.

Scientific Methodology WELCOMES transparency and debate in order to insure that we aren't left with "junk science" that winds up getting obliterated by reality later on.

They way YOUR scientists seem to be working is tantamount to declaring the Sun orbited the Earth crucifying or ex-communicating anyone who disagrees..

Doesn't change the FACT that the Earth was not the center of the universe.. but that was what the consensus was for centuries..

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext