SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (50974)5/9/2014 12:23:34 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 86355
 
Wave Energy Permit Rejected

August 7, 2012
By admin
Plan would have put up to 680 wave energy devices off Mendocino’s Coast

By David Gurney www.noyonews.net

Simulated water turbine, wave energy devices.

Another plan to harness power from Mendocino’s wild coast line has failed. GreenWave Energy Solutions, LLC was denied a preliminary permit for the proposed “Green Wave Mendocino Wave Park Project” for failing to work “in good faith” with the governing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC.

Listed in the permit application were plans to install 150 to 680 wave energy converters along 17 square miles of ocean – centered directly off the scenic town of Mendocino. According to the proposal, the devices would have been as close as half a mile to the Mendocino shore. The 2.5 by 7 mile stretch of ocean planned for wave power development, was also directly offshore of 2 recently enlarged “Marine Protected Areas” (MPAs) – created by the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, to protect sensitive marine resources.

After initially applying for and receiving a three-year preliminary-permit in May, 2009 Green Wave, LLC consistently failed to meet the regulatory requirements for their project. The company either filed late, or did not file at all, the progress reports and necessary documents.

According to a FERC document, GreenWave, “failed to timely file two six-month progress reports and neglected to file its NOI (notice of intent) and PAD (pre-applicationdocument) as required by its permit.” FERC cancelled Green Wave’s permit in September, 2010.

The lax company re-applied for the same permit one year later, in September 2011, and was met with a wall of local opposition as they did in their original attempt. Critics coined the company’s plot as “ocean industrialization.” FERC rejected Green Wave’s application July 19, 2012 and responded with it’s own criticisms, citing a lack of due diligence.

“When a prior permit for the same site is cancelled, it creates a presumption that the permit holder did not pursue its proposal in good faith and with due diligence…Commission staff gave GreenWave notices of probable cancellation on two occasions before canceling GreenWave’s prior permit,” writes Vince Yearick the Acting Director for FERC’s Division of Hydropower Licensing.

The denial also cited community concerns over potential site banking-sitting on the claim to the ocean area and leasing or selling it to another interested company.

Several ocean advocacy groups filed comments and requests to become stakeholders in the process. The Ocean Protection Coalition, FISH-Fishermen Interested in Hydrokinetics-and the city of Fort Bragg and Mendocino County were among those to file for stakeholer status.

“Many intervenors are concerned that GreenWave lacks genuine intent and resources to develop the proposed project and may instead be engaged in site banking. Intervenors also expressed concern that construction and operation of the project would adversely impact marine species and associated habitat, the local fishing and tourism industries, recreational and visual resources, and public safety,” reads the letter denying GreenWave’s latest permit application.

http://mendocinocountry.com/2012/08/07/wave-energy-permit-rejected/
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext