| Civil Rights Act: Fact or Legend               Harry R. Jackson, Jr. | May 12, 2014
 
 
   
 
 
 0
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Throughout  my life, I have been impacted by the work of Martin Luther  King and  others as they worked to bring equality to people of my race.  It is  interesting, however, the way in which people interpret the  events that  have brought us to this point. Most importantly, as the  nation marks the  fiftieth anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,  there is much about  this historic piece of legislation that has been  forgotten or  deliberately misrepresented. Few contemporary American  students may  remember that its supposed champion, President Lyndon B.  Johnson, left  office under the cloud of the increasingly unpopular  Vietnam War after  declining to seek a second term. Fewer still may  recall that it was  Southern Democrats, including Senators Al Gore, Sr.  and Robert Byrd, who  filibustered the legislation for 83 days or that  Republicans like Ohio  Congressman Bill McCulloch played a crucial role  in getting the bill  passed.
 
 On paper, the Act outlawed  discrimination based on race, color,  religion, sex or national origin.  It applied to voter registration  requirements, as well as segregation  in schools, workplaces and public  facilities. Together with the Voting  Rights Act that passed the  following year, it was arguably the most  important legislation of the  twentieth century.
 
 In one sense,  the legacy of the Civil Rights Act can hardly be  disputed. Since its  passage, black political participation has grown  astronomically and  remains high. In fact, the African-American voter  turnout rate was  higher than the white turnout rate in the 2012  presidential election.  There has also been a steady increase in the  number of black elected  officials, not to mention a black president  elected twice.
 
 But  it is also easy to give the legislation too much credit for  overall  black improvement. For example, as Census data demonstrates (and  many  black conservatives and moderates point out regularly), black  income  actually rose faster during the two decades that preceded the  Civil  Rights Act than in the two decades that followed. Thus much of  black  progress can simply be attributed to growing economic opportunity  and  the African American determination to overcome obstacles, including  Jim  Crow laws.
 
 Ironically, the success of the Civil Rights Act  inspired generations  of advocates for all sorts of causes, many of  which had nothing to do  with Jim Crow discrimination. In the decades  that followed, everyone  from animal rights activists, to environmental  extremists and Lesbian,  Gay, Bisexual and Transgender advocates would  try to further their  group’s agenda by framing it as a continuation of  the Civil Rights Act.
 |