Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

FJB

TideGlider

To: tejek who wrote (784744)	5/14/2014 1:33:38 AM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 1574187

>> She was the National Security Advisor and a member of the Obama administration. Why would she not speak for the president? She was NOT National Security Advisor. Had she been, that would have been different. When have you ever seen a president send out a UN Ambassador to talk about an attack on foreign soil that has national security implications? Rice either lied knowingly or read a falsified script like an actress. It was strange. She was clearly the wrong person to have been sent out to discuss it. In her position she had not bona fides to discuss the subject at all. I was astounded that NOT ONE of the five talk show hosts asked her WTF she was doing there rather than someone who had a legitimate role to play. >> "And that information turned out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people is patently false," she added. Except we now know, conclusively, that not only was it not correct, but that the facts were manipulated by the White House to downplay the role of terrorism FOR POLITICAL REASONS. To maintain his electability, the man sent out a woman to lie like hell. >> You have said nothing and proven even less than nothing. Have you not read ANYTHING about this story? In spite of chronic stonewalling, they were forced finally to release the linked email from Ben Rhodes that included a who's who of White House top-level people. "TO UNDERSCORE THAT THESE PROTESTS ARE ROOTED IN AN INTERNET VIDEO, AND NOT A BROADER FAILURE OF POLICY." You cannot get clearer than that. This is a classic cover-up. Why would they have to tell the person appearing on the morning shows with details like this? The point is to send out someone who knows WTF is going on. judicialwatch.org I think it is fine if you want to argue Benghazi is nothing but you ought to at least be up to speed on what is going on.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next