SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tech who wrote (1544)12/12/1997 8:12:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 3391
 
OK, now that the kids are in bed I can make a fool of myself and guess the answers. Normally, the more outrageous the claim the more likely it is to be true. However, I will try to just use common sense.

1. False. I suppose it is possible the Indians were huge people and thus had more blood, but I would guess they just had more red blood cells?

2. False. The steam engine was one of those 18th century inventions that changed the world so I doubt there was anything like it around as far back as the birth of Christ. Not only that, every lawn sprinkler I ever bought I just hooked up to the faucet and it spun around from the force of the water, not from energy used to boil it.

3. True. Oh, what the heck, maybe it did happen, although I never did see such a thing during any Kennedy documentary.

Trivia: No idea, but they must have something to do with Indians.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext