SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.91-1.1%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tony Viola who wrote (3479)9/22/1996 1:42:00 AM
From: Barry Grossman   of 186894
 
Tony:

"The HP FYI is touting their latest workstation based on the PA-8000 RISC chip as taking the lead for world's fastest workstation, , etc., etc. They have a graph of processing power vs. time, 1986 to 1996 and beyond. Anyway, the one they're touting now is at about 400 SPECint92. In what looks like next year (small graph), they get to about 500 with the PA-8200. Then, they have a discontinuity in the vertical, or performance axis. After that, they show no more PA---chip based workstations. Just Intel Merced. The reason they had to do a discontinuity in the vertical axis is that the performance, with the Merced, jumps to over 2000 SPECint92 in 1998. That would have put it off the graph! That's a 4X performance jump in one year!"

If the latest workstation (PA-8000 RISC chip) is 400 SPECint92 and next year it's a (PA-8200 RISC chip) 500 Specint92 and the Merced in 1998 is 2000SPECint92, what does this mean in terms understandable to a non-techie? Please interpret.

Second question: what will be possible to do on these workstations that isn't being done on them now.

Third question: Please explain the difference between a 400 SPECint92 workstation and today's top-of-the line PC.

Thanks.

Barry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext