The hockey stick charts of the AGW fraudsters are proof enough that their "science" is fraud. Their predictions fail. Every prediction they've made has failed. That defines it as FACT that their "science" isn't science... rather than wishful thinking and fraud, being driven by a commitment to enabling growth of government, or to sustaining particular programs (which obviously may include shared interests on the part of large corporate contractors as well as pure government project interest), or to policy impact desired (required and expected to be enabled by that "proof" of global warming which doesn't exist) all of which requires putting politics and policy goals... ahead of science, and ahead of truth.
It isn't just the left who are committed to obtaining that result which justifies their practice of science fraud... there are also those on the right who subscribe to the policy and plan to create a "new world order" with a "one world government." But, that still limits the interest to all those who have an attachment to the advancement of government interest at the expense of science fact, truth, and the public interest, which isn't better met by enabling and growing government on a global scale. But, there are wholly mercenary reasons, too. The EPA hacks... reveal themselves by tossing ozone into the mix... another instance of a science fraud being practiced against the public interest, only in order to make corporations more profitable than they would have been without new regulations forcing market adoption of less efficient and more expensive, but also more profitable, options in the technology of refrigerants. CFC's don't harm the ozone layer at all. Recent work has proven the fraud... but, it doesn't matter... given the corporations got their regulation forcing adoption of less efficient but more profitable options already. Now, it seems, there is a lot of money riding on enabling trading in carbon credits... which serves no valid or useful economic purpose... but which will make a lot of money for those who force it to happen... inspite of the massive, destructive, anti-economic impact.
Motives aside, the science here is no better than the science fraud re ozone. Not ONCE have the advocates for human causality through CO2 emissions shown that any ACTUAL correlations exist between ANY of their data and the climate... they have none that will pass the most basic tests of scientific validity. There is not a shortage of proof that there has been fraud practiced in trying to "fit" all sorts of data to the requirements by fabricating it... while still ignoring that all their predictions fail.
However, here is "actual" science that presents new data with VERY STRONG correlation that actually PASSES the test of validity... and readily enables making climate predictions you can expect will work.
youtube.com
Segment 4 presents and explains the concept and theory well enough...
Segment 5 provides data that leaves few questions... other than why they found it hard to get published.
The science in the links shows climate is primarily driven by solar energy (which of course it is) with variation produced by the combination of variation in solar output, and variation in the flux in cosmic radiation... pairing solar irradiation as a source of heat energy with cosmic radiation altering the bias in aerosolization that influences relative cloud cover...
FWIW, using nothing but the predictable variations in solar irradiation you can easily enough create models that DO function, as predictive models... that work... They're imperfect models, still... but, they DO work at a level far higher than any of those based in the fraud that depends on CO2 altering climate, which is fraud and nothing but fraud.
If there is a human driven component in climate at all... the only correlations enabling actually predictive work in science requires that the driver of that impact is ELF radiation modifying the ionosphere... meaning, either it is driven by purposeful efforts undertaken to modify the ionosphere, such as in direct ionospheric heating to alter the planetary scale interactions, such as is done in HAARP, youtube.com or is it a byproduct of electromagnetic spectrum pollution driven by our use of RF devices, including "the grid" itself as a large scale RF emitter. |
