SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Guidance II

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: 2MAR$5/20/2014 1:55:20 AM
   of 2077
 
CSIQ Had Great Q1 Results, But Is It A Buy after 30% loss to 22?

Summary
  • Canadian Solar delivered an upbeat Q1, with the company outperforming expectations on all key metrics.
  • Strengthening pricing, a strong project pipeline, and geographical diversification ensure a strong 2014.
  • The company's high cost structure is a cause for worry.
Canadian Solar ( CSIQ) announced strong results for Q1 2014 on Friday. All key metrics came at or above guidance and market expectations. The company delivered sales of $466.3M, compared to guidance of $415-430M; Module shipments came in at 500 MW, compared to guidance of 460-490 MW; and the gross margin was 14.7%, compared to guidance of 14-16%.

The total solutions business, or the project business, at 27% of sales, continues to become an increasingly larger part of the company's revenue stream. This project business not only has higher margins, but also provides downside protection from the volatile module business.

While the revenue upside and the growth in the project business is impressive, Canadian Solar's earnings came in at a subpar $0.07 per share. Gross margins were set back by about 100 basis points due to a fire in the company's cell factory. During the quarter, Canadian Solar purchased solar cells from outside parties, which increased the module cost per watt to $0.57 per watt - significantly higher than $0.54 per watt in the prior quarter.

Canadian Solar's guidance for Q2 shows modules shipments in the range of 600 MW-630 MW, with a 17-19% gross margin. The company also reiterated the stellar 2014 shipment guidance of 2.5 GW-2.7 GW and a revenue forecast of $2.7B-$2.9B.

The market seems to be not impressed with the results, and the stock price dropped about 10% after the earnings release. CSIQ is now selling at 50% discount from its recent high in January. With strong results and stable guidance, is this price drop a buying opportunity?



CSIQ data by YCharts

To analyze this company's investment potential, one has to start looking at the industry as a whole and look at the company's place in the industry. Unlike First Solar ( FSLR) [see our thesis here] and SunPower ( SPWR) [thesis here], Canadian Solar does not have a differentiated solar panel technology. Canadian Solar, JinkoSolar ( JKS), Yingli Green Energy ( YGE), Canadian Solar, ReneSola ( SOL), and Trina Solar ( TSL) are commodity manufacturers with very little product or technology differentiation. For more about our views on the commodity solar segment and the underlying risks, see our JinkoSolar thesis here.

Here is a summary of the positives and negatives of the company.

What We Like About Canadian Solar:

  • The company grew sales by about 28% in 2013, and the rapid growth is expected to continue for the next several quarters. While the company's growth lags that of some of its competitors, this is still a respectable performance.
  • ASPs were up in Q1, and are expected to be higher in Q2. Increasing ASPs provide dramatic leverage in commodity business, and the company is likely to outperform investor expectations as long as the ASPs do not collapse.
  • Canadian Solar's revenues are diversified across the world. Unlike some of its competitors, the company is not counting on strong China market to make the 2014 guidance, which we view as a positive. The upside here is that any strength in China's solar deployment can meaningfully improve the company's earnings.
  • The company is well-positioned in the North American market, and competes well with SunEdison ( SUNE) (see thesis here) and other North American players in the DG and Utility markets.
  • Canadian Solar's project pipeline of 1.2GW is impressive and likely to grow rapidly - especially in China and in Japan.
What We Do Not Like About Canadian Solar:

  • Module costs at $0.54 per watt (adjusted for a one-time fire issue) are higher than that of the industry leaders' costs by about 15%. We do not find this level of a cost disadvantage acceptable for a module vendor (however, note that 27% of company business is projects).
  • The company has a high debt load, and the balance sheet is weak.
  • Canadian Solar needs to have access to additional working capital to continue to grow - especially on the module side of the business. Secondary stock offerings improve the financial position, but result in earnings dilution. Preferred debt or other debt will further weaken the balance sheet.
  • Unlike its main competitor, JinkoSolar, Canadian Solar lacks the preferential access to China's large domestic solar market
  • Currency conversion volatility adds to the unpredictability of the company's earnings.
Canadian Solar is likely to perform well in the current environment, with flat-to-increasing module prices. Depending on its project completions, we believe the current analyst estimates of $3.68 for calendar year 2014 are very conservative. The likelihood of a dramatic earnings beat for 2014 is high.

However, due to the high cost structure of the module business, the company is highly susceptible to aggressive competition or demand implosion. We believe that investors considering commodity solar companies should only consider companies with excellent cost structures. In this respect, with a cost of about $0.54 per watt, Canadian Solar lags JinkoSolar's cost structure by about 15%.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext