SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 278.28+0.1%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HerbVic who wrote (169630)5/20/2014 4:02:44 PM
From: pyslent2 Recommendations

Recommended By
HerbVic
MGV

  Read Replies (1) of 213176
 
The ACSI report on a model-by-model basis. No idea how ACSI works or whether it has any credibility. But FWIW, the high end Androids seem to please their customers as much as the high end iPhones.

channelpartnersonline.com

1) Note II (85)
2) iPhone 5C (84)
3) iPhone 5S (83)
4) Galaxy S4 (82)
5) Galaxy S3 (82)
6) Note 3 (81)
7) iPhone 4S (81)
8) iPhone 5 (80)
9) iPhone 4 (77)
10) Galaxy S2 (72)

From your link:
Samsung's smartphone customer satisfaction score surged 7% to 81 on a 100-point scale in the latest ACSI survey. It was the first time Apple was not No. 1 in the category. Apple's score fell for the second year in a row, down 2% to 79.


The five individual iPhone scores above would come out to a mathematical average of 81, which does not square with the blended score of 79 in the report you cited. I presume that not within the top 10, there is a 3GS lower on the list with a score of 69, which is what it would take to bring the iPhone average down to 79. Seems like the blended score should weigh individual model scores by unit sales/ # respondents, or should sunset models that are no longer being sold.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext