Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

gamesmistress

steve harris

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (786535)	5/28/2014 11:43:37 AM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1576501

Thanks. That is a nice scholarly article as counter point. His counter point seems to be that this right was/is meant to be a right only when exercised in a collective manner, for a specific purpose, and in support of our government. I disagree. It is like saying freedom of speech is only applicable to a free press who supports the government, or only allowed with a government permit. The Bill of Rights was developed to protect individual natural rights which belong to people. * They were/are rights of individuals, protected by the constitution. * They were/are established to protect people from government tyranny. * They were/are not to be infringed upon by the government. To suggest these restrictions, imposed by the government, or that the government should decide when it is ok to exercise these rights is a complete corruption of intent.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next