Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (787394)	6/3/2014 1:23:43 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1576899

>> Science in which one has peers that will repeat anothers work to validate or invalidate his results... And sometimes (as in GW) in which those peers have as much at stake as the the person who did the original bullshit work. >> On the other hand a CPA's work is largely putting the dollars and cents in the correct column in the ledger... You won't get me to defending CPAs; however, I would point out that CPA's work is reviewed under more rigorous peer review standards than just about any profession. A CPA practice is required to hire other CPAs to come in and evaluate and criticize their work on a routine basis. And CPAs pass probably pass one of the most difficult entrance exams of any profession and subject themselves to extensive and rigorous ethics. Still, CPAs can be criminals and self-serving and all the bad things that scientists and bank robbers do. Because peer review sucks. When I voted, 30 years ago, to subject CPAs to peer review I thought it was a good thing. Only years later did I come to understand it is the same kind of back-slapping, good ole' boys network that had already existed. And some scientists trying to defend their jobs do exactly the same things.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next