RMF, Why would anybody do that? Are they getting rich from it? WHO has the biggest incentive to discredit global warming? More control over our lives, more taxes, more regulations, more ways to nag us and set up the Nanny State, all because CO2 is supposed to be a "pollutant."
Sorry, but I don't accept the notion that CO2 levels represent a "delicate balance" that has to be maintained.
First of all, it isn't a pollutant, like I mentioned before, yet it's being treated as such.
Second, who's to say what the ideal levels of CO2 need to be in the atmosphere? Is that ideal supposed to be identical to that just before the Industrial Revolution?
Third, I see "climate change" zealots blaming every single case of extreme weather on CO2. Cause you know, extreme weather events never happened until we started burning carbon, right?
There are many, many other environmental issues that deserve more attention than this CO2 nonsense. Such as the yellow dust storms that plague most of China, Korea, and even Japan. Or water pollution that affects most urban areas these days.
But with this "climate change" hype, environmentalism just turns into a religion.
Tenchusatsu |
