SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (252776)6/15/2014 8:02:32 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (4) of 540835
 
Many important workings of the cosmos are categorized as "natural phenomenon" or "forces of nature". Gravity, for example, is invisible and not really defined. We know what we know about it by inference. An apple breaks free and falls to the ground. We see the effect of gravity even though we can't see gravity itself.
The same is true of electromagnetism. Defined as another "class of physical phenomenon" which isn't much of a definition in and of itself and kind of has a supernatural ring to it. Our proof of electromagnetism is in the things mankind has managed to do with it. It was the harnessing of it that led the creation of the first motors. Man did not create electromagnetism itself. Man created things that use it. Electric charges and magnetism are just always there, parts of the physical world waiting to be found and used.

Many people, inc. myself, see God as a force in nature, ready to be found and used. And people do just that. They make the transcendent connection and use the power they get back to create things. They create better versions of themselves. They create organizations such as the Salvation Army or the huge network of Catholic Charities. For me, this is proof enough, although I agree it is very different from a lab experiment.

Scientifically speaking, there's no way thus far to prove or disprove God. I'm confused that invisibility seems to somehow disprove God. I can't see why that's a deal-breaker considering most of the cosmos is invisible to the naked eye, but so be it.

Getting back to the idea that the existence of something can be known inferentially, there are plenty of statistics concerning the behavior of people who are serious about religion and active in church work. But there are also some things in the fields of biology and psychiatry that are thought provoking. In the realm of scientific evidence, here's a link to a recent study.

Actually, I'm going to quickly post that link and another in subsequent posts. I seem to have forgotten how to navigate SI or it's Windows 8 or my old brain. If I leave what I'm writing to go fetch a link, I lose the post.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext