GITENNES Exploration (ase:GIT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GITENNES Exploration (ase:GIT)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: charred who wrote (915)	12/13/1997 5:35:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 1092

Its just geological geusswork based on many indicators drilling is one, surface erosional exposire is another, attitude of the formation etc... They did change drillers to Bradely but haven't yet tried the largest core sizes. The new drillers had just as much trouble as the last. 10% core recovery in bad breccia IS a problem. In my opinion they should have worked harder on solving the problem. It's one of those techno stumpers that need a breakthrough. I advised a bigger rig and some really heavy duty equipment. If they used a massive 5 inch tricone and drilled only slightly angled holes (25 degrees) with vacuum bailing it might actually be cheaper. ------------------------------ echarter@vianet.on.ca

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next