Apple 3.0 Message Board - Msg: 29593734

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple 3.0

AAPL 270.11

0.0%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doren who wrote (26)	6/23/2014 1:30:12 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 157

>> but this feature to me is so anti-music... the way I think about music I really hate it. Its like a snake eating its tail. I kind of feel the same way. My musical tastes are very broad, including a very large classical collection, lots of 60s-70s era rock, blues from the early days forward, and a bit of country & popular music. I wouldn't give a plug nickel for most music after the 80s (a few exceptions here & there). But I like to find new music by old performers, and you're just not going to find that through these methods. It would be nice if you could filter the selection in other ways like common, rare, ultra-rare or by date range or even country of origin. Or connect performers with other performers (e.g., like Byrds-Buffalo Springfield-Neil Young). I think if you had a system with a database that had more data about personnel on individual tracks. Of course, there probably is little demand for it considering the average radio station playlist contains a few hundred (at most) tracks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next