SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RMF who wrote (791198)6/24/2014 3:54:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
i-node
TimF

  Read Replies (1) of 1577123
 
RMF, to claim that the Middle East wouldn't have been falling apart without Bush is to assume that the Middle East was actually "staying together" before Bush came into office.

Saddam was no "stabilizing force" despite what the anti-war left portrayed him to be. His regime was a constant source of human rights violations, oppression, and even terrorism. Think of what the current leader of Syria wants to become, and you have Saddam in a nutshell.

You can debate whether Bush left Iraq and the Middle East in a better state than before, but you can't pretend that Bush started all of this instability or took it to a new level.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News