SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF
COMS 0.001300.0%Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scrapps who wrote (10652)12/13/1997 11:22:00 PM
From: jhild  Read Replies (1) of 22053
 
Well, Scrapps, I appreciate your position and agree with you that they have the right to add additional functionality - even this browser model of interacting and interconnecting, so long as it does not preclude other browsers from operating on anything but an equal footing. (Not forgetting of course without being able to prohibit OEM delivery of other browsers.)

I am hopeful though that you are not buying the argument that a monopoly is good for us. I believe there is great opportunity for mischief. I think we have seen some of that mischief exposed in the contracting language that they have forced on CPQ, DELL, et al.

As a broader issue, I think that culturally the courts and technology are ill-equiped to live in the same time frames. The very life of an innovative company can be snuffed out much faster than any suit can be resolved. If there is some good that can come from this it would be a streamlining of the judicial process to remain relevant to the pace of technology product cycles, over and above resolving these kinds of monopoly issues. Maybe even a technology court, that focused on technology based claims in an expedited manner - using what else but technology.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext