SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (792445)6/29/2014 12:31:23 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (4) of 1575623
 
>> For hundreds of years, the amendment process was effective. It no longer is.

That's an absurd remark. Outside the Bill of Rights the Constitution has been amended 17 times in its history. It isn't supposed to be done on a monthly basis.

But the idea that one party or one person can declare the amendment process dead because it doesn't suit your particular ideology is silly. The idea is that if states are going to be bound by amendments to their unifying document, there has to be some kind of agreement as to what those amendments will be. Right now the political environment is such that it would be difficult.

I support amending the Constitution through legal means; I think there are some things we need to do at this time to preserve the Constitution (e.g., term limits, repeal of the 17th, and I would like to see the 16th repealed and replaced with a NST).

But let me ask you a serious question. Assume you could get 3 amendments. What changes would you like to see?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News