SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (794525)7/10/2014 7:40:04 AM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations

Recommended By
joseffy
one_less
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) of 1579772
 
Ooops.....More bad news for Obozo.......

Censorship: 38 journalism groups slam Obama politically-driven suppression of news:

BY PAUL BEDARD | JULY 9, 2014 | 11:21 AM
In unprecedented criticism of the White House, 38 journalism groups have assailed the president's
team for censoring media coverage, limiting access to top officials and overall “politically-driven
suppression of the news.”
In a letter to President Obama, the 38, led by the Society of Professional Journalists, said efforts by
government officials to stifle or block coverage has grown for years and reached a high-point under
his administration despite Obama's 2008 campaign promise to provide transparency.
Worse, they said: As access for reporters has been cut off, the administration has opened the door
to lobbyists, special interests and “people with money.”
And as a result, they wrote, Obama only has himself to blame for the current cynicism of his
administration. “You need look no further than your own administration for a major source of that
frustration – politically driven suppression of news and information about federal agencies. We call
on you to take a stand to stop the spin and let the sunshine in,” wrote David Cuillier, president of
SPJ.

The administration has dismissed similar charges from other journalism groups, notably the White
House Correspondents’ Association, but the new letter sent Tuesday provided several examples of
censorship and efforts to block reporter access. Among them:
• Officials blocking reporters’ requests to talk to specific staff people.
• Excessive delays in answering interview requests that stretch past reporters’ deadlines.
• Officials conveying information "on background" — refusing to give reporters what should be
public information unless they agree not to say who is speaking.
• Federal agencies blackballing reporters who write critically of them.
“In many cases, this is clearly being done to control what information journalists — and the
audience they serve — have access to. A survey found 40 percent of public affairs officers
admitted they blocked certain reporters because they did not like what they wrote,” added the
letter.

In addition to asking for openness, the groups demanded Obama create an ombudsman position to
help clear away barriers to news coverage.

“It has not always been this way,” concluded the letter. “In prior years, reporters walked the halls of
agencies and called staff people at will. Only in the past two administrations have media access
controls been tightened at most agencies. Under this administration, even non-defense agencies
have asserted in writing their power to prohibit contact with journalists without surveillance.
Meanwhile, agency personnel are free speak to others — lobbyists, special-interest
representatives, people with money — without these controls and without public oversight.”
SPJ's Cuillier told Secrets, "I feel this excessive message management and information control are
caused by the professionalization of PR in the bureaucracy — in all levels of government."
And, he added, "It is up to journalists — and citizens — to push back against this force. Hard!"
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at
pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com.
Web URL: http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2550647
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext