SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 260.77+0.2%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: davesd who wrote (13267)12/14/1997 6:13:00 PM
From: Ian@SI  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Dave,

Are you describing anything that is different than it has always been? The equipment makers make more money more often than the chip makers.

Chip makers that aren't state of the art lose their seat at the "no-limit" poker game very quickly. By staying current, at least they have the hope that they'll be able to stay in the game.

With the view that you've stated, is there any reason for any chipmaker to stay in business losing money on every chip that is sold?

Ian.

P.S. INTC is the exception which proves the rule.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext