>>Why did mork send an employee here to bash the stock, do squeezes require
fundamentals?<<
have you listened to intel longs? they constantly talk a stock up. so what if mork talks a stock down. he's short. what do you expect?
btw, how many longs talk rmil up? what disaster are they scared of?
>>What leads to your ERROR in thinking that squeezes require fundamentals, do more
people buy bottled water or zip drives?<<
uf you are betting on a pure squeeze apart from fundamentals then, imho, you are very, very unwise. if it doesn't work you lose all or nearly all your dough. but hey, we're already 70% of the way there, aren't we? why?
>>Yes, apparently you did.<<
what did i miss? i kinow your down 70% in a few weeks. is there anything else i need to know?
>>AHAHHA, THIS explains why you cannot understand a squeeze, they DO
NOT REQUIRE fundamentals, you can short squeeze a stock that sells pet
rocks, if there is an illegal naked short position, SIMPLE laws of suplly and
demand, did you ever take an economics course?<<
what short position? YOU CAN'T VERIFY IT. YOU ARE GUESSING BASED ON HEARSAY. even less wise, imho.
THE REPORTED SHORT POSITION WAS 100K SHARES ABOUT 6 FREAKING MONTHS AGO. HE COULD HAVE COVERED 20 TIMES OVER. MAYBE 50 TIMES OVER. SO PROVE HE DIDN'T...
>>Who controls the pricing friend, not the cartel, the mm's that have the most to
lose if the squeeze happens.<<
oh REALLY. THEN THEY CAN DRIVE IT TO $0.01 AND KEEP IT THERE, RIGHT?
shades, occf was a short squeeze. float was 800k. stock went from $10 to $120 in about 4 months. i've been in a squeeze and this isn't one.
you are quite confused who is getting squeezed. it is YOU. btw, when this bowser hits $0.10 or so, the shorts will REALLY BE SCARED THEN, HUH? ;-) |
