SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Graystone who wrote (6573)12/15/1997 3:50:00 AM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (2) of 20681
 
Great Theatre
or
Sonnets from the Plutonese

It should be fairly obvious how things are going for the NAXOF. Her first big gun fired and completely missed, not a good sign. The aim of the gunners was good, it was likely the lookout who gave the directions.

I would like to say that the same logic used below to demonstrate why the big gun missed, applies to the platinum numbers.

<<I would like to point out some simple facts, if you are long on the NAXOF, you are trusting the "methodology", the certification of "methodology results" is redundant. If you suspect that something is amiss however, suspect the commercial viability of the methodology. This means that the certification is again, redundant.>>

That is right isn't it ??
Do we know which consultant said that they could start mining ???
How many years and how many millions of dollars did Johnson-Lett spend coming up with thier proprietary solution ????
Is 75 million enough, after all we looked at for about 90 days ?????
Will $500,000.00 dollars cash get Lett and Johnson through.??????

This Circular requires approval from the ASE for any assay methodology used if other than a fire assay methodology. In addition, this regulation requires the issuing company to process all samples using both the non-standard assay methodology as well as the conventional fire assay methodology

Does this circular mean that you are not allowed to assay the results of the Johnson-Lett process ??? I see one poster actually thought they had done a standard assay, heheheh.

This previously caused a slight misunderstanding but I am sure you can look and find comparable companies which have announced impressive results using a proprietary technology, some don't even use the words "patent pending", imagine that.

Looks like those crazy Canadians know nothing about mining (heheheh). Imagine, not accepting the Johnson-Lett Methodology.
I think Tom Cummings just didn't like Mad Jimmy.

Well, by extrapolation, platinum/palladium numbers should be up around 6 ozs to the tonne, man it sounds better and better each time you dream about it. And to think old Johnson had all this locked up inside his head and was just waiting to spring it on us.

I think Johnson will get the Nobel Prize for Alchemy.

For a clear process of how the methodology was developed by the NAXOF take a look here.

The Methodology of a Scam
207.183.153.206

The co owner of the Johnson-Lett process has a sidebar here..
businessexchange.com
Note the names of management and the granular nature of the gold. It's a steal, don't you think ?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext