SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Judiciary
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (458)8/11/2014 4:28:45 PM
From: one_less   of 817
 
The duty to warn assumes the duty for the state to protect is inoperable. It also implicates the victim in any associated crime. The cases presented did not clarify if the danger was clear and present or not. Assuming the state has done it's job, there should not be any assumed clear and present danger. If the stalker was known by the victim to be in violation of the state's terms, the duty falls on the victim to inform the state, then if someone is injured because the state did not rectify the problem, the liability falls back on the state.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News