LS, copy/paste doesn't mean you understand things. You obviously didn't. Heat capacity is irrelevant. Total heat in the ocean is irrelevant. What matters to a fish is the actual temperature, not the heat change. Next you'll start quoting that heat in units of Hiroshima bombs, which the paucity of scientific literacy in the Global Alarmist camp.
"Hiroshima bomb" is not a unit of energy, it's a unit of shroud waving.
The temperature is what affects fish. Same for people. That's why weather reports report temperature and not the heat content of the air over a particular place. The humidity is also significant, which is why that is also often quoted. The dew point matters too. The heat content does not. You won't find "Heat content over London today has increased by 42 petajoules". People don't care. They, like fish, want to know what the temperature is going to be.
When you demonstrate such paucity of understanding, it makes people realize you are clueless about climate. People don't have to be supersonic scientists to see dishonesty and ignorance. They know "Yeah, it's temperature that matters, not total heat. Those Global Alarmists are scamsters, or just don't understand things".
When your falsehoods are pointed out, but you persevere with them anyway, your arguments move into the realm of dishonesty or outright stupidity. People don't want to pay big taxes and imposts on their fuels because some scamsters want to fleece them. So the Alarmists have lost the argument. Carbon tax in Oz has been ditched. The CO2 emissions trading scams have been running out of steam.
Mqurice |