Do you know we (Alan anyway and Emile for sure) were up until
2:30 a.m.? Unreal.
What this issue is about is a social problem on the scale of about 8-l/2 on a one to ten.
Demanding evidence to support claims, Emile presented a rather
thorough representation of some book which I do believe exists, and which as Jack says, you have to really, really dig to find.
So now it seems the Holy Spirit by his wisdom has presented us with the child in Solomon. Do we say everything he posted is a lie by some madman claiming to be a Jewish convert? That would not
clear the error circulating right now.
Do we say Emile has made up this book and is not quoting from anything. That I know is too stupid to consider.
Do we say it looks like the only rationale thing to do is to find a
Talmud and see what the comparison is, if any.
Or does everyone get furious and leave and the problem remains a rotting elephant in the front room we must step around for years, as the problem gets worse and worse on both sides. ANdersons flourish everywhere, Alan distances himself even more from organized Christianity in all forms, Emile rages stronger about the Talmud because no one will listen, and the aetheist lurkers jump for joy and toast each other that the darkness stays dark.
No light here, just little lights going off.
I'm staying. |
