SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 374.96+0.2%Nov 19 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (107197)8/25/2014 1:21:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) of 217891
 
Thank you Joan, I understand that you more or less agree with those calculations.

If so no accounting for the cost of capital locked into land is an incorrect approach, some one paid for the land, and that money instead of being invested in the land could have been invested in the stock market like in S&P contracts and then the question is which investment over the longer term provided better yield when a premium should be given for liquidity

I do know that land prices over the last few years grew dramatically but so has the S&P

Not everyone inherited agricultural land and therefore cost of land should be part of the calculation
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News