SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (57925)9/11/2014 8:34:17 AM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
well ratie, because of your zero comprehension of even the simplest scientific concepts you have deluded yourself into thinking there is some experiment. All observations show that no theory of temperature C02 sensitivity has been demonstrated. All models encoding the supposed alarmists sensitivity have failed totally in both forecasting and hindcasting any association or CO2 and global temperatures.

The models encoded and tested the speculated CO2 sensitivity and totally failed.

There is no science that supports any of the IPCC global warming alarmism being driven by CO2 from any source.

This represents what the total of all anthropogenic global warming invented science amounts too.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News