<Whom would you trust: the US military sent in by Bush who reported that they did not find any WMD, or those good-for-nothing Iraqis whom we trained and armed but then dropped their weapons and ran and cried "Help, the ISIS folks have taken over the WMDs that we had."<
Hmmm.. Let me see here.. This is a tough one...
Shall we believe Bush, who told us intelligence showed conclusively that Chemical Weapons (WMD) were stockpiled by Iraq, while Saddam an Iraqi, told us that Iraq had NO WMD's, and that Bush's intelligence was wrong. Many claim Bush intentionally lied about the existence of the same WMD's to drag us into war with Iraq.. And now you are saying that the Iraqi's are now lying by Claiming that they do have stockpiles of Chemical Weapons, which they have an Agreement with the UN to dispose of, and a facility the the Iraqis had security to protect, which was recently over run by ISIS.. But, we should instead BELIEVE BUSH and his findings that there were No WMD's?
Is that about it???
<r those good-for-nothing Iraqis whom we trained and armed but then dropped their weapons and ran and cried "Help, the ISIS folks have taken over the WMDs that we had."<
It a plausible theory, except for the fact that they had an agreement with the UN for the last couple of years, to dispose of them.. You know.. The one's that never existed, along with the storage and production facilities...
All those pictures you see, UN agreements, etc..... Purely a conspiracy.
I appreciate the offer.. But, I will pass on your "thinking hat" offer.
And so it goes,
PCSTEL |
