<<<<<""you are saying that ISIS did indeed overrun an old "chemical weapons depot" in Iraq""
<I have no idea. That was from you, originally.<<<<<
No it wasn't..I simply repeated the news stories..
nydailynews.com
Which I wrote as..
Here is what I said...
"OK.. So not the storehouses of Chemical weapons ISIS overran in Iraq...
Got it... Obama, via Russia took the Chemical Weapns from Syria, which in theory, removed them from the grasp of ISIS. While at the same time, ISIS overran a chemical weapons depot in Iraq, (which did not contain chemicals at all), which Iraq then reported to the UN that they could not destroy the chemical weapons, (not there), that they had pledged to destroy (that the UN said were there) according to a UN agreement.."
No, it's what you "Edited it for you" said.
Not quite; I've edited it for you.
Obama, via Russia took the Chemical Weapons from [Assad], which, in theory, [left those possibly] in the grasp of ISIS [or our BFF, the FSA, still in their hands]. [While at some time], ISIS [or FSA] overran a chemical weapons depot in Iraq, (which did not contain chemicals at all, [because Russia helped Syria get rid of them while making Obama look good)], [either or both may have been give quantities of gas by their sympathizers within the army.]
So you are the one edited the sentence to read like this.. Only a few words of my Original Post (black) existed after your edit. (Red)
[While at some time], ISIS [or FSA] overran a chemical weapons depot in Iraq, (which did not contain chemicals at all, because Russia helped Syria get rid of them while making Obama look good)],
************************************************
I asked you if you were saying that ISIS did indeed overrun an old "chemical weapons depot in Iraq, and you edited it to say there were no chemicals in the facility " because Russia helped Syria get rid of them while making Obama look good)],
PCSTEL |
