SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: getgo234 who wrote (3159)12/15/1997 7:51:00 PM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (1) of 6980
 
All: As one who e-mailed Fool and demanded a correction, I beleive that its "response" is intellectually dishonest. It is they who have been artful in wriggling off the hook of the plain and straightforward meaning of their statement that COMS and ORACLE and BAY had just warned that they would not meet expectations. How does the Fool know what Bay told this or that analyst in private? If the Fool is implying that it has confirmed with the DLJ analyst, how does it know that he was not mistaken. Perhaps he is covering his misundersanding of the Bay information.

What we know for certain, is what Bay told everyone on the record. And it is not what the Fool reported. It is the opposite.

I would suggest that everyone e-mail the Fool again and/or e-mail Bay and ask is the Fool statement about Bay's double-dealing with information true. If not, what will Bay do about it?

Vepoc
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News