SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA
AMD 240.05-1.6%2:24 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (12292)9/28/2014 7:17:18 PM
From: TGPTNDRRead Replies (1) of 72259
 
neo,

Re: Intel will be happy if they can keep good margins in the PC space, and somehow keep ARM out of that.>

I think they'd be *THRILLED*, but I doubt they will be for that reason.

IMO, X86 is going to have to get cheap. $200+/chip for volume sales isn't going to work, and I don't think $50/chip is going to work in ~ 3 years, though I've been known to be wrong.

The RISK set I thought would take over by the late 1990s didn't, and the MISC looks to have a ways to go also.

Volume had a lot to do with that, IMO, X86 was produced in vastly greater numbers, the research could be split to nickels on the chip....

Now it's the various RISCS and getting to be some MISCS. I don't think that any of them are greater in individual production, but I do think their knowledge curve has overtaken the X86 curve.

Who around here does program the various RISCS/MISCS? What's your opinion? Had I believed Combjelly back in the '90s I'd be a multi-millionaire instead of just a millionaire.

We'll see, I guess, in the next 5 or so years.

Only bets I have, in the area of chips and computers, are a couple of hundred calls for AMD 01/2016.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext