SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Bidder who wrote (4002)12/15/1997 9:14:00 PM
From: Valuepro  Read Replies (2) of 10836
 
Micheal,

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, so here's mine! Your logic is as empty as your head.

KRY is successor in interest to the party who legally staked the LC 4/6 claims. The claim owners have been prevented from excerising their rights because of illegal maneuvers on the part of the Ministry of Mines and Engery (read friend of PDG). 8 of KRY's 11 claims have been upheld by the court and the other 3 are pending. These 3 matters are only related to whether or not the statute of limitations applies when an arm of the government has illegally prevented the rightful owner from solidifying their claim. That's all, and that's why so many believe this is practically a "can't lose" situation for KRY.

It's Placer's history on the property which should taint them as the claim jumpers, not Crystallex. Grow up! Present some evidence/logic with your opinions or keep quite.

ValuePro
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News