COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

-18.8%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dee Jay who wrote (10752)	12/15/1997 11:41:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (2) of 22053

>>Well David, how about a rationale to buttress that thought? You summed it up pretty well, Dee Jay. The variety of different implementations of the Rockwell chipset was a principal cause of difficulties in deployment, and there is every reason to suspect the same will be true when the code changes. >>Since you include LU with USR it doesn't seem that an innate bias is involved in that comment - so why do you think so? No hard evidence, but numerous rumblings that the LU chipset design is superior to Rockwell's and will adapt more easily as will USR's. It's purely speculation at this stage, but suffice to say that the rumblings come from some of very same places that pegged the original 'Flex rhetoric for exactly what it was.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next