Recessions are best identified in the rear view mirror. RtS
  Big Four Economic Indicators Show Possible Rollover
  financialsense.com
  Note from dshort: With this morning's release of the Consumer Price Index for September, we can now calculate Real Retail Sales for last month.
  Official recession calls are the responsibility of the NBER Business  Cycle Dating Committee, which is understandably vague about the specific  indicators on which they base their decisions. This  committee statement is about as close as they get to identifying their method.
    There is, however, a general belief that there are four big  indicators that the committee weighs heavily in their cycle  identification process. They are:
    Industrial ProductionReal Personal Income (excluding Transfer Payments)Nonfarm EmploymentReal Retail Sales    The Latest Indicator Data
    With this morning’s release of the September Consumer Price Index, we  can now calculate Real Retail Sales. I reported the nominal Advance  Retail Sales last week, which showed September at -0.3% (-0.32% at two  decimals) month-over-month, down from 0.6% in August. That was much  worse that the mainstream forecasts. When we adjust for inflation,  September sales came in even worse at a -0.41%. The chart below  illustrates the series since 2009 with a linear regression to help us  analyze the trend.
     
    The contraction in sales attributed to an unusually severe winter is  clearly evident. April through July performed below trend. August saw a  positive bounce that put us back to trend, but September appears to have  reverted to the substandard summer growth.
    The Census Bureau's Retail Sales series is, as I've pointed out  elsewhere, subject to substantial revisions, to the latest month  shouldn't be taken too seriously.
      The Generic Big Four
    The chart and table below illustrate the performance of the generic  Big Four with an overlay of a simple average of the four since the end  of the Great Recession. The data points show the cumulative percent  change from a zero starting point for June 2009. We now have the three  indicator updates for the 61th month following the recession. The Big  Four Average is (gray line below).
     
    Current Assessment and Outlook
    The overall picture of the US economy had been one of slow recovery  from the Great Recession with a clearly documented contraction during  the winter, as reflected in Q1 GDP. Data for Q2 supported the consensus  view that severe winter weather was responsible for the Q1 contraction  -- that it was not the beginnings of a business cycle  decline.  However, the average of these indicators in recent months  suggests that, despite the Q2 rebound in GDP, the economy remains near  stall speed. We'll need some near-term improvement to avoid rolling  over.
      
    The next update of the Big Four be the month-end Real Personal Income less Transfer Payments.
    Background Analysis: The Big Four Indicators and Recessions
    The charts above don't show us the individual behavior of the Big  Four leading up to the 2007 recession. To achieve that goal, I've  plotted the same data using a "percent off high" technique. In other  words, I show successive new highs as zero and the cumulative percent  declines of months that aren't new highs. The advantage of this approach  is that it helps us visualize declines more clearly and to compare the  depth of declines for each indicator and across time (e.g., the short  2001 recession versus the Great Recession). Here is my own four-pack  showing the indicators with this technique.
       
    Now let's examine the behavior of these indicators across time. The  first chart below graphs the period from 2000 to the present, thereby  showing us the behavior of the four indicators before and after the two  most recent recessions. Rather than having four separate charts, I've  created an overlay to help us evaluate the relative behavior of the  indicators at the cycle peaks and troughs. (See my  note below on recession boundaries).
          Click for a larger image
    The chart above is an excellent starting point for evaluating the  relevance of the four indicators in the context of two very different  recessions. In both cases, the bounce in Industrial Production matches  the NBER trough while Employment and Personal Incomes lagged in their  respective reversals.
    As for the start of these two 21st century recessions, the indicator  declines are less uniform in their behavior. We can see, however, that  Employment and Personal Income were laggards in the declines.
    Now let's look at the 1972-1985 period, which included three  recessions -- the savage 16-month Oil Embargo recession of 1973-1975 and  the double dip of 1980 and 1981-1982 (6-months and 16-months,  respectively).
          Click for a larger image
    And finally, for sharp-eyed readers who can don't mind squinting at a  lot of data, here's a cluttered chart from 1959 to the present. That is  the earliest date for which all four indicators are available. The main  lesson of this chart is the diverse patterns and volatility across time  for these indicators. For example, retail sales and industrial  production are far more volatile than employment and income.
          Click for a larger image
    History tells us the brief periods of contraction are not uncommon,  as we can see in this big picture since 1959, the same chart as the one  above, but showing the average of the four rather than the individual  indicators.
          Click for a larger image
     The chart clearly illustrates the savagery of the last recession. It  was much deeper than the closest contender in this timeframe, the  1973-1975 Oil Embargo recession. While we've yet to set new highs, the  trend has collectively been upward, although we have that strange  anomaly caused by the late 2012 tax-planning strategy that impacted the  Personal Income.
    Here is a close-up of the average since 2000.
          Click for a larger image
       Appendix: Chart Gallery with Notes
    Each of the four major indicators discussed in this article are illustrated below in three different data manipulations:
    - A log scale plotting of the data series to ensure that distances on  the vertical axis reflect true relative growth. This adjustment is  particularly important for data series that have changed significantly  over time.
 - A year-over-year representation to help, among other things, identify broader trends over the years.
 - A percent-off-high manipulation, which is particularly useful for identifying trend behavior and secular volatility.
    Industrial Production
    The US Industrial Production Index ( INDPRO) is the oldest of the four indicators, stretching back to 1919, although I've dropped the earlier decades and started in 1950.
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
    Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments
    This data series is computed as by taking Personal Income ( PI) less Personal Current Transfer Receipts ( PCTR) and deflated using the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index ( PCEPI). I've chained the data to the latest price index value.
    The "Tax Planning Strategies" annotation refers to shifting income  into the current year to avoid a real or expected tax increase.
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
    Transfer Payments largely consist of retirement and disability  insurance benefits, medical benefits, income maintenance benefits (more  here).
    The chart below shows the Transfer Payment portion of Personal  Income. I've included recessions to help illustrate the impact of the  business cycle on this metric.
     
    Total Nonfarm Employees
    There are many ways to plot employment. The one referenced by the  Federal Reserve researchers as one of the NBER indicators is Total  Nonfarm Employees ( PAYEMS).
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
    Real Retail Sales
    This indicator is a splicing of the discontinued retail sales series ( RETAIL, discontinued in April 2001) with the Retail and Food Services Sales ( RSAFS) and deflated by the seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index ( CPIAUCSL).  I used a splice point of January 1995 because that date was mentioned  in the FRED notes. My experiments with other splice techniques (e.g.,  1992, 2001 or using an average of the overlapping years) didn't make a  meaningful difference in the behavior of the indicator in proximity to  recessions. I've chained the data to the latest CPI value.
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
          Click for a larger image
      Note: I represent recessions as the peak month  through the month preceding the trough to highlight the recessions in  the charts above. For example, the NBER dates the last cycle peak as  December 2007, the trough as June 2009 and the duration as 18 months.  The "Peak through the Period preceding the Trough" series is the one  FRED uses in its monthly charts, as explained in the  FRED FAQs illustrated in this  Industrial Production chart. |