Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 261.90

+0.4%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tito L. Nisperos Jr. who wrote (13469)	12/16/1997 8:13:00 PM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (2) of 70976

Tito, Isn't ironic that we are have downgrades by brokerage houses while the number of funds holding AMAT has increase from approx. 363 a month ago to 377 last Tuesday to 389 in todays IBD, 12/16/97. The 389 number today is greater than the number of funds owning AMAT shares in the big $108 run up in August '96 by approx. 12 funds. IMHO, it appears to me that the funds are not making the same mistake they did in the last down cycle in 1996 when the small investor got ahead of them. Could there be a relationship between downgrades and increased number of mutual funds? Of course not!:) Could there be purchases made by mutual funds at the same time that they are downgrading AMAT? Of course not!:) Just my two cents. Paul V.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next