SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (823801)12/19/2014 5:04:41 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 1574761
 
.... tree ring data have behaved pretty much as any other paleoclimate proxy behaves. There are conditions under which any given proxy works, and there are conditions under which the proxy can’t be trusted and should not be used. Decades ago, when the Hockey Stick was first formulated, the loss of signal in the tree ring record was somewhat mysterious, though numerous good ideas explaining it were out there.

They are essentially admitting that tree rings aren't good proxies for temperature. Sometimes tree rings work, they say, and sometimes they don't. What that means practically is that when tree rings give them the answer they want, they're "good proxies" and when they don't they're not.

Interestingly, the last 10 years or so of tree ring research has failed to force the conclusion that tree rings are not good sources of past temperature data;

The burden of proof should be on the parties using tree rings as temperature proxies that they ARE good proxies.

------------------------------------------

Climate Audit on this:

climateaudit.org

climateaudit.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext