SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: explorationguy who wrote (8803)12/20/2014 3:49:07 PM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (2) of 10654
 
So most of our 90 million was spent, not pursuing the requirements of a mine as defined in Salazar, but merely doing fieldwork for the eventual developer of Schaft Creek?

..and since we now know that was always going to be Teck, regardless of the contract that said we would earn the entire project (subject to arms length back-in rights)

..is it not safe to state that Elmer spent our investment, not to benefit his shareholders, but to do advance work for the benefit of Teck...for some reason unclear to us

Or is there some other way to explain what happened up there?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News