SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: explorationguy who wrote (8834)12/22/2014 10:46:01 AM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (2) of 10654
 
I live 20 miles from Rosemont

That project would never be a go in this competitive desert watershed

Like Pebble, it was simply in a location that had more environmental baggage than mining in this era can overcome

..but my criticism, which is really one of management risk, is that they certainly spent enough on Schaft to have gained a much better handle on a mine as was required under Salazar

They pissed away a lot of millions doing work irrelevant to that objective

The question that I haven't heard an answer to is why did Elmer do advance work that was of incidental value to CUU holders but of primary value to Teck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News