SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: explorationguy who wrote (8844)12/23/2014 2:54:12 PM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (1) of 10654
 
which was a heads up that the Salazar was being set aside

That's a rather charitable phrasing

I take it that it was their attempt to mislead all the shareholders, except Ernesto, of course that they had actually performed on the contract

..they have never admitted to not delivering the BFS, which they absolutely did not do IAW Salazar

It has worked too

There are very few people who understand that the BFS was never delivered, so we intentionally defaulted on the Salazar agreement

That being the case, there really has never been a BFS on the Schaft Creek project

I don't know if one is required for Teck to move forward or not

I suppose it would depend on their intentions to obtain financing or another partner

But they cannot admit the exercise that was performed at the behest of CUU is applicable to their plans without admitting they also defaulted by failing to deliver the Liard interests as specified in Salazar
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News