SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Hog Head
Theotokos
To: louel who wrote (8971)1/2/2015 9:03:09 AM
From: Metacomet2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 10654
 
As I've said before, I believe every one of your points are valid considerations and each would impact in some measure on whatever deal was finally achieved

However, none of them, in any combination, or in total, can explain why we didn't simply give Teck the FN and deliver the BFS

The only thing that makes sense is the fact that upon delivery, Teck was obligated to convey the balance of their interest in the project to CUU

They would have maintained their back-in rights and could have negotiated pretty much the deal we would up with if it was the duster you claim

..if CUU, while in title to what they had earned, could not find any other taker for the project at a better price than Teck was prepared to pay at the expiration of the back in period

We essentially shut out all potential buyers and gave it to Teck for zilch, plus a handful of beans

..and we can speculate as to whether there was serious attempt to demonstrate an economic mine per Salazar on the property thru the series of questionable, but expensive surveys that would seem to be of far greater benefit to the developer than the explorer

That stack of surveys might have been of interest to another taker as well

It is, as Elmer told us, a porphyry district

Teck got a hell of a deal on that real estate

..even by BFS standards
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext