SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CUUallin who wrote (9017)1/4/2015 11:40:47 AM
From: mudguy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
dsikorsk
Theotokos

  Read Replies (1) of 10654
 
I'm not going to repeat myself, I have explained it before in detail. Suffice to say that there is not an unique way of interpreting core assay summaries to solve the problem at hand. That deeper, richer mineralization makes the whole core look better than it is. Waste is at the surface, what are the grades there? What is the structure? I know you don't have the answers, because they don't publicly give them out. Absence of evidence is evidence for nothing.

I take the stance that Elmer is competent and chose not to drill the waste for a geological reason(s). I can envision what those reasons are but this is not a venue to discuss that. Others might differ in their opinion, but I think parading the available data as "fact" of the potential is misleading. It is an interpretation of the assays through a core, interpolated and summarized to make it as shiny as possible. Do you know how many assays go into a core like that? I do and it is not nearly as many as you probably assume.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News