Naxos Resources (NAXOF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7437)	12/17/1997 11:09:00 AM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (1) of 20681

That still doesn't answer the question. Why not take one sample, split it in half, and test it side by side. One half with J/L, one half without. I don't really think comparing a sample to one assayed 6 or 8 months ago relevant. If Naxos wantss increased credibility for their process then let Ledoux do simoultaneous testing on a split sample. If the "process" gives the anticipated results "side by side" a standard fire assay that can't give those results , there would no longer be a question in what caused the difference. No one would be able to say "salting". Everyone would realize the difference was J/L. No questions whatsoever. At least if they did have a question it sure wouldn't be with Naxos or J/L.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next