SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (827585)1/4/2015 8:45:23 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
tejek

  Read Replies (1) of 1575424
 
When was that proven? From what I've seen it is just the opposite.

But I don't frequent wingnut sites. So I might have missed something...

It is pretty obvious that things are changing. Polar vortices seem to be yearly thing now. Which is what you would expect from an unstable and weakening jetstream. Which we have. And that is what you'd expect from a decrease in the temperature gradient between arctic regions and the lower latitudes. Which we have measured. Not to mention the decrease in ice volume in the Arctic, Greenland and the Antarctic. All of the major icesheets, with the possible exception of the East Antarctic icesheet, and even that isn't certain, are unstable. That means even if things were to cool off, which there is no sign of, they will only lose ice at an accelerating rate.

I see no sign of your thesis that it is safe to do nothing has any basis in reality.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News